Hathaway v. Defense
| Oona A. Hathaway |
| Department of Defense |
| 3:2021cv01009 |
| July 22, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time until October 7, 2021. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 9/8/2021. (Lee, Diana)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Department of Defense to 10/7/2021. (Perez, J.) |
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until Oct. 7, 2021 to File a responsive pleading re #1 Complaint, by Department of Defense. (Elicker, Natalie) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie Nicole Elicker on behalf of Department of Defense (Elicker, Natalie) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Oona A. Hathaway. Department of Defense served on 8/6/2021, answer due 9/5/2021. (Schulz, David) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS REISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Department of Defense* with answer to complaint due within *30* days. Attorney *David A. Schulz* *Ballard Spahr LLP* *1675 Broadway 19th Floor* *New York, NY 10019*. (Payton, R.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint, filed by Oona A. Hathaway, #4 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 07/26/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Department of Defense* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *David A. Schulz* *Ballard Spahr LLP* *1675 Broadway 19th Floor* *New York, NY 10019*. (Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 07/22/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 07/22/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Judge Victor A. Bolden added. (Walker, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Defense ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6587285.), filed by Oona A. Hathaway. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Schulz, David) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Department of Defense. (Schulz, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hathaway v. Defense | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Oona A. Hathaway | |
| Represented By: | David A. Schulz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Department of Defense | |
| Represented By: | Natalie Nicole Elicker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
