Langdon v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
| Tamera Langdon |
| Amazon.com Services, LLC |
| 3:2021cv01079 |
| August 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC's Corporate Disclosure Statement by Amazon.com Services, LLC. (Berglund, Curtis) |
| Filing 9 Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC's Answer and Separate Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Special Defenses with Jury Demand by Amazon.com Services, LLC.(Berglund, Curtis) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Curtis A Berglund on behalf of Amazon.com Services, LLC (Berglund, Curtis) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by James M. Campbell on behalf of Amazon.com Services, LLC (Campbell, James) |
| Docket Entry Correction re #6 Waiver of Service Executed. Modified docket text to correct "waiver sent on" date to 8/10/2021 and "answer" date to 10/9/2021. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Amazon.com Services, LLC waiver sent on 8/10/2021, answer due 10/9/2021 filed by Tamera Langdon. (Sullivan, Ryan) Modified on 9/8/2021 to correct "waiver sent on" and "answer" dates. (Bozek, M.). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Tamera Langdon. Signed by Clerk on 8/10/2021. (Agati, Kathryn) |
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/10/2021. (Agati, Kathryn)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/10/2021. (Agati, Kathryn)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/9/2021, Discovery due by 2/9/2022, Dispositive Motions due by 3/16/2022. Signed by Clerk on 8/10/2021. (Agati, Kathryn)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6606656.), filed by Tamera Langdon.(Sullivan, Ryan) |
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Langdon v. Amazon.com Services, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tamera Langdon | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Sullivan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amazon.com Services, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Curtis A Berglund |
| Represented By: | James M. Campbell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
