Tonucci v. Metro North Commuter Railroad
| Everett Tonucci |
| Metro North Commuter Railroad |
| 3:2021cv01580 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Charles S Haight |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Metro North Commuter Railroad.(Fineman, Beck) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Attorney(s) Robert Naumes to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6790147) by Everett Tonucci. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Robert Naumes)(Kenney, Brian) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Attorney(s) Christopher Naumes to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6790098) by Everett Tonucci. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Christopher Naumes)(Kenney, Brian) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Beck S. Fineman on behalf of Metro North Commuter Railroad (Fineman, Beck) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Everett Tonucci (Kenney, Brian) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Metro North Commuter Railroad* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Brian P. Kenney* *Early, Ludwick, Sweeney & Meisenkothen, LLC* *265 Church Street, 11th Floor* *New Haven, CT 06508*. (Gutierrez, Y.) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Everett Tonucci, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 11/29/2021.(Gutierrez, Y.) |
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 11/29/2021.(Gutierrez, Y.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/28/2022; Discovery due by 5/31/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 7/5/2022. Signed by Clerk on 11/29/2021.(Gutierrez, Y.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6736410.), filed by Everett Tonucci.(Kenney, Brian) |
| Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Metro North Commuter Railroad. (Kenney, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tonucci v. Metro North Commuter Railroad | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Everett Tonucci | |
| Represented By: | Brian P. Kenney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metro North Commuter Railroad | |
| Represented By: | Beck S. Fineman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
