Czarzasty v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
Nancy Czarzasty |
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes Products, LLC, Synthes USA, LLC, DePuy Synthes, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Inc and Medical Device Business Services, Inc. |
3:2021cv01593 |
November 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Michael P Shea |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Acknowledgment of Receipt re: Case Transferred Out - Case transferred from Connecticut has been opened in Northern District of Texas as case 3:21-cv-03193, filed 12/22/2021. (Oliver, T.) |
Case electronically transferred to the Northern District of Texas. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 9 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER Signed by John W. Nichols on 11/17/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nancy Czarzasty. All Defendants. (Barnes, Joseph) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *DePuy Synthes Products, LLC, DePuy Synthes, Inc., Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Inc, Medical Device Business Services, Inc., Synthes USA, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Joseph M. Barnes* *Reardon Law Firm* *160 Hempstead St., PO Drawer 1430* *New London, CT 06320*. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Nancy Czarzasty, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 12/1/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/30/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/30/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/29/2022. Discovery due by 6/1/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 7/6/2022. Signed by Clerk on 11/30/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/29/2022. Discovery due by 6/1/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 7/6/2022. Signed by Clerk on 11/30/2021. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6738327.), filed by Nancy Czarzasty.(Barnes, Joseph) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Barnes, Joseph) |
Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.