Johnson v. Connecticut et al
| Sharon Johnson |
| State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, Jeff Miller and Steve Plourde |
| 3:2022cv00112 |
| January 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vanessa L Bryant |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Security for Costs. The defendants having made application to the Clerk of Court for an order requiring the plaintiff to deposit or file a bond with sufficient surety in the sum of $500.00 pursuant to Local Rule 83.3(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District of Connecticut, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff herein file a bond as security for costs in this action within thirty (30) days from this date. Signed by Clerk on 2/28/22. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Extension of Time until April 1, 2022 to File a Resposive Pleading by State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, Jeff Miller, Steve Plourde. (Bennett, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Security for Costs by State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, Jeff Miller, Steve Plourde. (Bennett, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer P Bennett on behalf of State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, Jeff Miller, Steve Plourde (Bennett, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 9
Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. Signed by Clerk on 1-31-2022. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, Jeff Miller, Steve Plourde * with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jamaal T. Johnson* *The Law Office of Jamaal T. Johnson, LLC* *1229 Albany Avenue, Ste. 301* *Hartford, CT 06112*. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Order Re: Chambers Practices, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Sharon Johnson, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #6 Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 1/21/22.(Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 1/21/22. (Attachments: #1 discovery attachment) (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE: Judge's Chambers Practices. Counsel are directed to read and comply with the Chambers Practices and Standing Orders prior to filing any document. So ordered. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 1/21/22. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 1/21/22. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 1/21/22. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/22/2022; Discovery due by 7/23/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 8/27/2022. Signed by Clerk on 1/21/22. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut Department of Corrections, Jeff Miller, Steve Plourde, filed by Sharon Johnson. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing fee received from Jamaal T. Johnson: $ 402, receipt number 730265. (Velez, F.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
