Johnson v. Utica National Insurance Group et al
Plaintiff: Robert W. Johnson
Defendant: Utica National Insurance Group, Drivers Express Watertown Corporation, Veronica Jones, Utica Mutual Insurance Company and Drivers Express Watertown
Case Number: 3:2022cv00124
Filed: January 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2022 Filing 15 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE RE: INDEX AND RECORD ON APPEAL re: #14 Notice of Appeal. The attached docket sheet is hereby certified as the entire Index/Record on Appeal in this matter and electronically sent to the Court of Appeals, with the exception of any manually filed documents as noted below. Dinah Milton Kinney, Clerk. Documents manually filed not included in this transmission: none (Freberg, B)
February 28, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #11 Initial Review Order by Robert W. Johnson. (Freberg, B)
February 17, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE. A copy of this Notice and a copy of Docs. #10, #11, and #12, have been mailed to the self-represented plaintiff at his address of record: Robert W. Johnson, 112 Court St. Apt. 2, Watertown, NY 13601. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 2/17/2022. (McCallum, C.)
February 17, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF RE: POSSIBLE ANTI-FILING INJUNCTION. Please see attached Notice for important information. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 2/17/2022. (McCallum, C.)
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached Initial Review Order, the #1 Complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 2/17/2022. (McCallum, C.)
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis based on the financial information provided. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 2/17/2022. (McCallum, C.)
February 11, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert W. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Freberg, B)
January 24, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE. Copies of this Notice and Doc. #7 have been mailed to the self-represented plaintiff, Robert W. Johnson, at his address of record: 112 Court St., #2, Watertown, NY 13601. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/24/2022. (Katz, S.)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.Plaintiff has filed what purports to be an "In Forma Pauperis Application Affidavit[,]" stating that he is "a poor person with no income, bank accounts, properties, assets or any other monetary tangibles." Doc. #2 at 1 (sic). 28 U.S.C. 1915 provides that "any court of the United States may authorize the commencement of any suit without prepayment of fees or security therefor, by a person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such [person] possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor." 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1).Plaintiff's "Affidavit" does not satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 1915 for several reasons. First, it does not include an adequate statement of plaintiff's financial circumstances. For example, plaintiff states he has no income but does not indicate if he receives any other type of state or federal benefits that the Court may consider when ruling on a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See Whatley v. Astrue, No. 5:11CV01009(NAM)(ATB), 2011 WL 5222908, at *1 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2011) ("The court may deny an application to proceed in forma pauperis if [the applicant] fails to submit the required financial information[.]"), report and recommendation adopted, 2011 WL 5196716 (Oct. 31, 2011).Second, plaintiff's "Affidavit" is not signed under the penalties of perjury, an essential requirement of the statute authorizing the commencement of an action without prepayment of fees or costs. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1); United States v. Copen, 378 F. Supp. 99, 103 (S.D.N.Y. 1974) ("Leave to proceed in forma pauperis may be obtainable only upon submission by the party of an affidavit made as required by that statute."); Davila v. Doar, No. 07CV05767(SHS)(DF), 2008 WL 4695004, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 22, 2008) ("Under 28 U.S.C. 1915, the Court may grant in forma pauperis status where a plaintiff has submitted an affidavit (or declaration under penalty of perjury, see 28 U.S.C. 1746) detailing his or her financial situation, as well as the nature of the action and the affiant's belief that he or she is entitled to relief.").Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff shall file a renewed Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, sworn under the penalties of perjury, providing an adequate statement of his financial situation, or pay the required filing fee of $402.00 on or before February 14, 2022. If plaintiff fails to do so, this case will be dismissed. If plaintiff pays the required filing fee, or is granted in forma pauperis status after filing an appropriate motion, the Court will then proceed to determine whether the Complaint as filed states a claim for which relief can be granted, and whether this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's claims, before determining whether the Complaint may proceed to service of process. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/24/2022. (Katz, S.)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. All counsel and self-represented parties are advised that any requests for relief, including the rescheduling of conferences or hearings that have been calendared on ECF, must be made by filing of a motion on the docket, in full compliance with all applicable Federal and Local Rules. Relief from deadlines, orders, and calendars may not be obtained by calling or emailing chambers staff or the Clerk's Office. Court staff cannot provide advice or guidance, and ex parte communications with the Court are generally improper. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/21/2022.(Caffrey, A.)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 01/21/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 01/21/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/22/2022. Discovery due by 7/23/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 8/27/2022. Signed by Clerk on 01/21/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
January 21, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert W. Johnson. (Fazekas, J.) Modified on 1/24/2022to correct file date(Fazekas, J.).
January 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Drivers Express Watertown Corporation, Veronica Jones, Utica National Insurance Group, filed by Robert W. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fazekas, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Utica National Insurance Group et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert W. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Utica National Insurance Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Drivers Express Watertown Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Veronica Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Utica Mutual Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Drivers Express Watertown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?