Price v. Edward M. Lombard & Associates et al
| Adriana Josephine Price |
| Edward M. Lombard & Associates and Frank Bruno & Associates |
| 3:2022cv00492 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Other Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 05/20/2022. (Kuegler, Adam)
|
| Set Deadline per 6 order: Amended Pleadings due by 5/11/2022. (Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3), if the Court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the Court must dismiss the action. Generally, a federal district court may exercise subject matter jurisdiction over a civil action only if there is federal question jurisdiction, applicable to all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States, or if there is diversity jurisdiction, which requires diversity of citizenship and an amount in controversy exceeding $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1332(a). The statutes referenced in the complaint under which this action is allegedly brought are criminal laws. Criminal cases can be pursued in federal court only by the United States Attorney, not by private citizens. To pursue an action for tax fraud or identity theft, Plaintiff may file a complaint with the United States Attorney. The complaint does not establish civil subject matter jurisdiction, either through federal question jurisdiction or diversity jurisdiction. The Court therefore DISMISSES this action without prejudice to re-filing. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this case, she must file an amended complaint that adequately establishes that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction. The amended complaint must be filed on or before May 11, 2022. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, the Clerk is directed to close this case.Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 04/11/2022. (Kuegler, Adam)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 4/4/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 4/4/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/3/2022, Discovery due by 10/4/2022, Dispositive Motions due by 11/8/2022. Signed by Clerk on 4/4/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adriana Josephine Price. (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edward M. Lombard & Associates, Frank Bruno & Associates, filed by Adriana Josephine Price.(Imbriani, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
