Pallotta v. Eleveld
| Tinamarie Pallotta |
| Jeffrey Eleveld |
| 3:2022cv00993 |
| August 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to the #1 Complaint on or before October 6, 2022. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/16/2022. (Sweeney, Kevin)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Defendant Eleveld to 10/6/2022. (Sweeney, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time for 28 days to Respond to #1 Complaint by Jeffrey Eleveld. (Attachments: #1 copy of envelope) (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tinamarie Pallotta. Jeffrey Eleveld served on 8/18/2022, answer due 9/8/2022. (Goselin, Peter) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Jeffrey Eleveld* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Peter D. Goselin* *The Law Office of Peter Goselin* *P.O. Box 331313* *Hartford, CT 06133*. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Tinamarie Pallotta, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Protective Order, #5 Order Signed by Clerk on 8/4/2022. (Fanelle, N.) |
|
Filing 5
Standing Order For Fair Labor Standards Act Cases Not Pleaded as Collective Actions. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/4/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/4/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/4/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/3/2022 Discovery due by 2/3/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 3/10/2023 Signed by Clerk on 8/4/2022.(Fanelle, N.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jeffrey Eleveld ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7023380.), filed by Tinamarie Pallotta.(Goselin, Peter) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Jeffrey Eleveld. (Goselin, Peter) |
| Judge Kari A. Dooley added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pallotta v. Eleveld | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tinamarie Pallotta | |
| Represented By: | Peter D. Goselin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jeffrey Eleveld | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
