Yopp v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Regina Yopp |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2022cv01035 |
| August 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
The Defendant having filed the administrative record, the Court hereby enters the following Supplemental Scheduling Order: Plaintiff shall file a motion to reverse and/or remand and a supporting memorandum of law no later than December 13, 2022. Defendant shall then have until February 10, 2023, to file a motion to affirm or a motion for voluntary remand. Fourteen days thereafter, by February 24, 2022, Plaintiff may file a reply pursuant to Local Rule 7(d). Prior to the filing of any dispositive motions, counsel are encouraged to confer regarding the merits of the case in an effort to determine whether a reversal and voluntary remand are appropriate.The Court reminds the parties of the previously filed Standing Scheduling Order which sets forth page limits and form and content requirements for motions and supporting memoranda. In addition to complying with these requirements, memoranda should avoid boilerplate discussions of the governing legal standards as the Court is familiar with the standard of review and the sequential evaluation process employed in the analysis of Social Security disability applications. The parties should focus on informing the Court of relevant and controlling legal authority and applying it to the facts of this case. Motions filed by the parties must comply with the requirements set forth above, in the Standing Scheduling Order, and in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to comply may result in denial of the motion. Requests for extensions of these deadlines are discouraged and, unless unusual circumstances dictate otherwise, counsel should not seek an extension of greater than thirty (30) days. Any motion for extension of a deadline must include a showing of good cause as required by Local Rule 7(b)(2) and must be filed at least three (3) days before the existing deadline, unless there is a compelling reason which does not permit that time period to be met. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge S. Dave Vatti on 10/14/2022. (Ellis, Bernadette)
|
| Filing 15 Social Security Transcripts. (Attachments: #1 Supplement part 1, #2 Supplement part 2, #3 Supplement part 3, #4 Supplement part 4, #5 Supplement part 5, #6 Supplement part 6, #7 Supplement part 7, #8 Supplement part 8, #9 Supplement part 9, #10 Supplement part 10)(Byun, June) |
| Filing 14 Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case has been referred to Magistrate Judge S. Dave Vatti for all purposes including issuing a Recommended Ruling. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/11/2022.(Anastasio, F.) |
|
Filing 13
REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 9/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Anne M Zeigler on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Zeigler, Anne) |
| Filing 11 Docket Entry Correction re #10 Electronic Service Documents, #9 Electronic Summons Issued. Documents entered in error. (Santos, Sarah) |
| Filing 10 ENTERED IN ERROR: NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #6 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Regina Yopp, Update Answer Deadline, 7 Notice of New SSA Action, #5 Scheduling Order, 8 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Regina Yopp, #4 Order Signed by Clerk on 08/29/2022.(Santos, Sarah) Modified on 9/8/2022 to enter in error (Santos, Sarah). |
| Filing 9 ENTERED IN ERROR: ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Howard D. Olinsky* *250 South Clinton St.* * Ste 210* *Syracuse, NY 13202*. (Santos, Sarah) Modified on 9/8/2022 to enter in error (Santos, Sarah). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia on 8/17/22. (Lefevre, Arthur)
|
| Filing 7 Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. (Reis, Julia) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/16/2022. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/16/2022. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Reis, Julia)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Regina Yopp. (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Regina Yopp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Olinsky, Howard) |
| Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 10/15/2022. (Reis, Julia) |
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
