Reilly v. Target Stores, Inc.
Ann Reilly |
Target Stores, Inc. |
3:2022cv01218 |
September 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
Robert A Richardson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Target Stores, Inc..(Neborsky, Dawn) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Notice (Other) filed by Target Stores, Inc., #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Target Stores, Inc., #7 Notice (Other) filed by Target Stores, Inc., #1 Notice of Removal filed by Target Stores, Inc., #9 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Target Stores, Inc., #3 Notice (Other) filed by Target Stores, Inc., #10 Protective Order, #8 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #6 Notice (Other) filed by Target Stores, Inc. Signed by Clerk on 9/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 standing order on removed cases)(Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE by Target Stores, Inc. Certification of Filing Copy of Notice of Removal in State Court (Neborsky, Dawn) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by Target Stores, Inc. Standing Order in Removed Cases (Neborsky, Dawn) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Target Stores, Inc. Civil Miscellaneous Notices and Orders (Neborsky, Dawn) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Target Stores, Inc.. (Neborsky, Dawn) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Target Stores, Inc. No Pending Motions in State Court (Neborsky, Dawn) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Dawn M. Neborsky on behalf of Target Stores, Inc. (Neborsky, Dawn) |
Filing 10 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/28/2022. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/28/2022. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 8 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/27/2022 Discovery due by 3/30/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 5/4/2023 Signed by Clerk on 9/29/2022. (Fanelle, N.) |
Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Stores, Inc. from Judicial District of Hartford, case number HHD-CV22-6160289-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7083818, filed by Target Stores, Inc..(Neborsky, Dawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Reilly v. Target Stores, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ann Reilly | |
Represented By: | David Alan Zipfel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Target Stores, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Dawn M. Neborsky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.