Chambers v. USA
| Eric Chambers |
| USA |
| 3:2022cv01514 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE TO #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). by USA filed by USA. (Kale, Rahul) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Peter D. Markle withdrawn from case. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/27/2022. (Stamegna, Ashley)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Peter D. Markle to Withdraw as Attorney by USA. (Markle, Peter) |
|
Filing 9
Order. The Court sua sponte extends the deadline for service on the Respondent's representative to December 22, 2022. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/22/2022.(Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying without prejudice #7 Motion to Appoint Counsel for the reasons previously articulated. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/21/22. (Dooley, Kari)
|
| Filing 7 LETTER MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Eric Chambers. (Fanelle, N.) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by February 23, 2023. See attached. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/14/2022. (Stamegna, Ashley)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Denying without prejudice #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. There is no constitutional right to counsel during a Section 2255 proceeding, see Harris v. United States, 367 F.3d 74, 77 (2d Cir. 2004), and it is not apparent from the content of the petition that the appointment of counsel at this juncture is necessary or appropriate to serve the interests of justice, see 18 U.S.C. Section 3006A(a)(2)(B). However, the Court shall revisit this decision sua sponte after receipt and review of the Government's response to the Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/14/2022. (Stamegna, Ashley)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Eric Chambers. (Fanelle, N.) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/29/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/29/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). by Eric Chambers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 criminal judgment) (Fanelle, N.) |
| Judge Kari A. Dooley and Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chambers v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Eric Chambers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Jocelyn J. Courtney Kaoutzanis |
| Represented By: | Peter D. Markle |
| Represented By: | Rahul Kale |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
