Zeil v. United States Department of Justice
Donald J. Zeil |
United States Department of Justice |
3:2023cv00289 |
March 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Victor A Bolden |
Thomas O Farrish |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE by Donald J. Zeil (Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Donald J. Zeil. United States Department of Justice served on 4/10/2023, answer due 6/9/2023. (Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 13 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *United States Department of Justice* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. *Donald J. Zeil* *424 Flanders Road* *Southington, CT 06489*. (Mendez, D) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to United States Department of Justice. (Mendez, D) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing fee received from Donald J. Zeil: $ 402.00, receipt number 605653 (Peterson, M) |
Filing 10 RECOMMENDED RULING - Denying #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Donald J. Zeil, 3 Pages. Objections due by 4/7/2023. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 3/24/23.(Wood, R.) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 3/3/2023.(Mendez, D) |
Filing 5 Notice Of Pro Se Appearance, by Donald J. Zeil. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 4 Consent to Electronic Notice By Self-Represented Litigant, by Donald J. Zeil. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 3 MOTION For Appointment Of Counsel, by Donald J. Zeil. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Donald J. Zeil. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 1 Petition For Writ Of Mandamus against United States Department of Justice, filed by Donald J. Zeil. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3, #4 Attachment 4, #5 Attachment 5, #6 Attachment 6, #7 Attachment 7, #8 Attachment 8, #9 Attachment 9, #10 Attachment 10)(Mendez, D) |
Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Zeil v. United States Department of Justice | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Donald J. Zeil | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States Department of Justice | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.