Schmidt v. Safe Home Security Inc
| Rodney Schmidt |
| Safe Home Security Inc |
| 3:2023cv00377 |
| March 27, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Alvin W Thompson |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Safe Home Security Inc* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Angela K. Troccoli* *Kimmel & Silverman, PC* *30 E. Butler Pike* *Ambler, PA 19002*. (Barry, L) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement,, #5 Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Rodney Schmidt Signed by Clerk on 3/27/2023.(Barry, L) |
Filing 5
Standing PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 3/27/2023.(Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 3/27/2023.(Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/26/2023 Discovery due by 9/26/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 10/31/2023 Signed by Clerk on 3/27/2023.(Barry, L)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 3/27/2023.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Safe Home Security Inc ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7287442.), filed by Rodney Schmidt. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Civil Cover Sheet)(Troccoli, Angela) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Safe Home Security Inc. (Troccoli, Angela) |
| Judge Alvin W. Thompson and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schmidt v. Safe Home Security Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rodney Schmidt | |
| Represented By: | Angela K. Troccoli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Safe Home Security Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
