Reardon v. Kijakazi
| Marcus Reardon |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2023cv00960 |
| July 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Omar A Williams |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall file its certified administrative record on or before October 19, 2023. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 09/14/2023. (Kim, Hyo June)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Extension of Time until October 19, 2023 File Certified Administrative Record Update Answer Deadline by Kilolo Kijakazi. (Pollack, Kathryn)
|
|
Filing 11
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 8/14/23. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case is reassigned to Judge Omar A. Williams for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 8/14/2023.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, along with a financial affidavit. Plaintiff has fully completed the required information. He asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that Plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Court has also reviewed the Complaint, ECF No. 1, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and finds the claim is sufficient to proceed to service of process on the defendant.. Signed by Judge Maria E. Garcia on 7/23/23. (Esposito, A.)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn Pollack on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Pollack, Kathryn)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. (Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE to Counsel: Due to privacy restrictions on social security cases, absent both a consent to electronic notice and an approved motion for efiling privileges, counsel must mail paper copies to self-represented litigants. Signed by Clerk on 7/19/2023.(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/19/2023.(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
|
Filing 5
Standing ORDER Re: Social Security Cases. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/19/2023.(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing ORDER on Social Security Appeals. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Kilolo Kijakazi to 9/19/2023. (Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
|
Judge Michael P. Shea and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. Motions referred to Maria E. Garcia (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marcus Reardon. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Yelner, Olia)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Marcus Reardon.(Yelner, Olia) Modified on 7/20/2023 to correct parties filed against (Hushin, Z.).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
