Sandor v. USA et al
| Administrator Janos Sandor |
| USA, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated |
| 3:2024cv00496 |
| March 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Robert M Spector |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER re #12 Notice (Other), filed by Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. The prefiling conference requirement is hereby waived. Defendants Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. may file their motion to dismiss without a prefiling conference. So ordered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5/21/2024. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER re #18 Notice (Other) filed by USA. The prefiling conference requirement is hereby waived. Defendant, United States of America may file it's Motion to Dismiss without a prefiling conference. So ordered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5/21/2024. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE by USA The United States respectfully renews its request for a pre-filing conference in connection with its anticipated Motion to Dismiss (Hildebrand, Emma) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine Suvari on behalf of USA (Suvari, Catherine) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER denying without prejudice re #15 Notice (Other) filed by USA for failure to comply with the prefiling conference requirements. Specifically that no request for a prefiling conference may be submitted unless the attorney making the request has conferred with other counsel of record and discussed the proposed motion in a good faith effort to clarify the issues, eliminate or reduce the area of controversy and arrive at a mutually satisfactory resolution. Cf. D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 37(2)(requiring counsel to confer before filing motionsrelating to discovery disputes). Any request for a prefiling conference must include a statement that the attorney submitting the request has conferred with other counsel and must briefly describe the results of the conference. Any renewal of this motion must comply with this requirement. So ordered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5/17/2024. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE by USA The United States respectfully requests a pre-filing conference in connection with its anticipated Motion to Dismiss (Hildebrand, Emma) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Emma K. Hildebrand on behalf of USA (Hildebrand, Emma) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian V. Otero on behalf of Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (Otero, Brian) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. Huntington Ingalls Defendants respectfully request a pre-filing conference in connection with Huntington Ingalls' anticipated Motion to Dismiss. (Otero, Brian) |
| Filing 11 Disclosure Statement by Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. for Huntington Ingalls Incorporated. (Otero, Brian) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Order on Pretrial Deadlines, Electronic Filing Order, Standing Protective Order, and Notice to Counsel and Self-Represented Parties served on Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Office of the Judge Advocate General, Department of the Navy, General Counsel of the Navy, Attorney General of the United States, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., and the United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut on April 5, 2024, filed by Janos Sandor. (Reardon, Kelly) |
| Filing 9 Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with #8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., USA* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Kelly E. Reardon* *The Reardon Law Firm P.C.* *160 Hempstead Street* *New London, CT 06320*. (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Standing Protective Order, Dkt. 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, and #1 Complaint. Signed by Clerk on 3-29-2024. (Shafer, J.) Modified on 4-1-2024 (Shafer, J.). |
| Filing 8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Shafer, J.) |
|
Filing 5
Standing Protective Order. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 3-28-2024. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 3-28-2024. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: amended pleadings due by 5-28-2024, discovery due by 9-27-2024, dispositive motions due by 11-1-2024. Signed by Clerk on 3-28-2024. (Shafer, J.)
|
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 3/28/24.(Hushin, Z.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7700948.), filed by Estate of Xavier Mitchell-Sandor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Reardon, Kelly) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Reardon, Kelly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
