Cayer v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
Diane Cayer |
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc., Novo Nordisk US Commercial Holdings Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Novo Nordisk Research Center Seattle, Inc. and Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries LP |
3:2024cv00809 |
May 2, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
Thomas O Farrish |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 10 MDL Transfer Order. Case transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Signed by Clerk Tiffaney D. Pete, MDL Panel. (Fanelle, N.) |
Case electronically transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Inc., Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries LP, Novo Nordisk Research Center Seattle, Inc., Novo Nordisk US Commercial Holdings Inc., Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Kelly A. Fitzpatrick* *Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder, PC* *350 Fairfield Avenue* *Bridgeport, CT 06604*. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Electronic Filing Order, #7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, 3 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #2 Exhibit filed by Diane Cayer, #6 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Diane Cayer. Signed by Clerk on 5/3/2024. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Fanelle, N.) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 5/2/2024.(Perez, J.) |
Filing 2 EXHIBIT Civil Cover Sheet by Diane Cayer re #1 Complaint. (Fitzpatrick, Kelly) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7746426.), filed by Diane Cayer.(Fitzpatrick, Kelly) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Fitzpatrick, Kelly) |
Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.