Padula et al v. Dinsmore et al
| VeyeZER, LLC, William Padula and Craig Andrews |
| Ted Dinsmore, Spheregen Holding, LLC and Spheregen Technologies, LLC |
| 3:2024cv00913 |
| May 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER granting #24 Motion for Extension of Time; granting #25 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motions for extension of time until August 26, 2024, to file a response to Defendants' motion to dismiss and to file a reply in support of Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunctive relief.Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 7/19/2024. (Thompson, M.)
|
| Filing 25 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #19 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction until 8/26/2024 by William Padula. (Bartlett, Kenneth) |
| Filing 24 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #22 MOTION to Dismiss until 8/26/2024 by William Padula. (Bartlett, Kenneth) |
| Filing 23 Memorandum in Opposition re #19 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Ted Dinsmore, Spheregen Holding, LLC, Spheregen Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Zaehringer, Kristen) |
| Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss by Ted Dinsmore, Spheregen Holding, LLC, Spheregen Technologies, LLC.Responses due by 8/5/2024 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Zaehringer, Kristen) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER granting #20 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until July 15, 2024 to respond to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint and Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 6/21/2024. (Rafla-Yuan, D)
|
| Filing 20 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until July 15, 2024 to respond to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint and Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Ted Dinsmore, Spheregen Holding, LLC, Spheregen Technologies, LLC. (Zaehringer, Kristen) |
| Filing 19 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by VeyeZER, LLC.Responses due by 7/1/2024 (Bartlett, Kenneth) |
| Filing 18 Disclosure Statement by VeyeZER, LLC. (Bartlett, Kenneth) |
| Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs, filed by VeyeZER, LLC.(Bartlett, Kenneth) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE by VeyeZER, LLC filing of amended complaint (Bartlett, Kenneth) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH PRETRIAL ORDER by VeyeZER, LLC Rule 7.1 disclosure-Veyezer LLC (Bartlett, Kenneth) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth G. Bartlett on behalf of Craig Andrews (Bartlett, Kenneth) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth G. Bartlett on behalf of VeyeZER, LLC (Bartlett, Kenneth) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth G. Bartlett on behalf of William Padula (Bartlett, Kenneth) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Ted Dinsmore, Spheregen Holding, LLC, Spheregen Technologies, LLC of Pending Motions (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Zaehringer, Kristen) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Ted Dinsmore, Spheregen Holding, LLC, Spheregen Technologies, LLC re: Statement Per Standing Order on Removed Cases (Zaehringer, Kristen) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #6 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 5 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #4 Notice of Appearance filed by Spheregen Technologies, LLC, Spheregen Holding, LLC, Ted Dinsmore, #2 Disclosure Statement filed by Ted Dinsmore, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Spheregen Technologies, LLC, Spheregen Holding, LLC, Ted Dinsmore, #8 Standing Protective Order, #7 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Disclosure Statement filed by Spheregen Technologies, LLC, Spheregen Holding, LLC Signed by Clerk on 5/24/2024. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases)(Freberg, B) |
|
Filing 8
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/22/2024.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/22/2024.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 6
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/21/2024 Discovery due by 11/21/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 12/26/2024 Signed by Clerk on 5/22/2024.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 5 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 5/22/2024.(Maturo, F.) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristen Zaehringer on behalf of Ted Dinsmore, Spheregen Holding, LLC, Spheregen Technologies, LLC (Zaehringer, Kristen) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement re: Rule 7.1 by Spheregen Holding, LLC, Spheregen Technologies, LLC. (Zaehringer, Kristen) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement re: Rule 7.1 by Ted Dinsmore. (Zaehringer, Kristen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ted Dinsmore, Spheregen Technologies, LLC, Spheregen Holding, LLC from New Haven Superior Court, case number NNH-CV24-6142558-S. Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACTDC-7772763, filed by Ted Dinsmore, Spheregen Technologies, LLC, Spheregen Holding, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Zaehringer, Kristen) |
| Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
