Bruenn v. Kohler, Inc.
| Ellen Bruenn |
| Kohler, Inc. |
| 3:2024cv00919 |
| May 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert M Spector |
| Alvin W Thompson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. Telephonic Initial Planning Conference set for 7/22/2024 at 12:30 PM before Judge Alvin W. Thompson. Dial-in instructions have been emailed to counsel of record. Anyone wishing to observe this proceeding should contact chambers at 860-240-3224 to request the dial-in instructions. (Eagan, O.) |
| Filing 18 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Kohler, Inc..(Stretton, John) |
| Filing 17 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Stretton, John) |
Filing 16
ORDER: This order corrects the previous order at ECF No. 15 to reflect that the defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by July 15, 2024. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 7/1/24. (Eagan, O.)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Kohler, Inc. to 7/15/2024. (Ferguson, L.) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER: The plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #14 ) is hereby GRANTED, absent objection. The plaintiff shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by July 15, 2024. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 6/27/24. (Eagan, O.)
|
| Filing 14 Second MOTION for Extension of Time until July 15, 2024 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Kohler, Inc.. (Stretton, John) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 6/5/2024. (Ferguson, L.)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Kohler, Inc. to 7/1/2024. (Ferguson, L.) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: The defendant's Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #3 ) is hereby DENIED as moot. See ECF No. 11 . It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 5/24/24. (Eagan, O.)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: The defendant's amended, consented-to motion for extension of time (ECF No. #4 ) is hereby GRANTED. The defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by July 1, 2024. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 5/24/24. (Eagan, O.)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #6 Electronic Filing Order, #8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Notice of Removal filed by Kohler, Inc., #7 Standing Protective Order, #9 Notice re: Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 5/24/2024.(Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 4 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time until July 1, 2024 to Respond to Complaint by Kohler, Inc.. (Stretton, John) |
| Filing 3 First MOTION for Extension of Time until June 24, 2024 to Respond to Complaint by Kohler, Inc.. (Stretton, John) |
| Filing 9 Notice re: Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 5/23/2024. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocols Attachment)(Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Gaskins, A) |
|
Filing 7
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 5/23/2024.(Gaskins, A)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 5/23/2024.(Gaskins, A)
|
|
Filing 5
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/22/2024 Discovery due by 11/22/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 12/27/2024 Signed by Clerk on 5/23/2024.(Gaskins, A)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 5/23/2024.(Maturo, F.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Kohler, Inc. from Superior Court J.D. of New Haven, case number NNH-CV24-6142851-S. Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACTDC-7774465, filed by Kohler, Inc.(Maturo, F.) |
| Judge Alvin W. Thompson and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bruenn v. Kohler, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ellen Bruenn | |
| Represented By: | Lewis H. Chimes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kohler, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John Gerard Stretton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
