Biswas v. Kobylanski et al
Ashudev Biswas |
Christopher Michael Kobylanski and Michael Kobylanski |
3:2024cv01015 |
June 10, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Maria E Garcia |
Sarala V Nagala |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' FAILURE TO ANSWER OR TIMELY RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Defendants were required to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by August 1, 2024. See ECF No. 9 . Given Defendants failure to timely file an answer or other response to the complaint, the Court directs Plaintiff to move for entry of a default against Defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) on or before August 26, 2024. Failure to do so will result in the Court dismissing the case for failure to prosecute. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 41(a). In the event that Defendants choose in the interim to file an answer or other response to the complaint, Defendants shall also file a motion for extension of time nunc pro tunc stating why there is good cause for their failure to comply with the scheduling requirements of the Court and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.Plaintiff's counsel shall serve a copy of this order on Attorney Fink, as counsel for Defendants, via email and regular mail, and shall file a notice on the docket documenting such service by August 9, 2024. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/5/2024.(Hagemann, E) |
Answer deadline updated for Christopher Michael Kobylanski to 8/1/2024 and Michael Kobylanski to 8/1/2024. (Bergeson, Samantha) |
Filing 9 ORDER. Pursuant to the stipulation filed at ECF No. 8, Defendants shall appear and answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by August 1, 2024. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/23/2024.(Piccolo, M) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION Stipulation Accepting Service by Ashudev Biswas. (Kommer, John) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #5 Standing Protective Order, #4 Electronic Filing Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines #1 Complaint filed, by Ashudev Biswas. Signed by Clerk on 6/11/2024. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 5 Standing Protective Order. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 6/10/2024. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 6/10/2024. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/9/2024. Discovery due by 12/10/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 1/14/2025. Signed by Clerk on 6/10/2024. (Mendez, D) |
Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 6/10/24.(Hushin, Z.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christopher Michael Kobylanski, Michael Kobylanski ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7795740.), filed by Ashudev Biswas.(Kommer, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.