Blackman v. Nelson et al
| David Blackman |
| Frank Nelson and Wayne W. Sell Corporation |
| 3:2024cv01087 |
| June 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vernon D Oliver |
| Robert M Spector |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set deadlines per #23 Scheduling Order: discovery due by 11-25-2025; first step to initiate dispositive motion due by 10-24-2025; status report due by 8-25-2025 and 12-2-2025. (Shafer, J.) |
Filing 23
SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties Rule 26(f) Report #22 is approved as amended. Discovery due by November 25, 2025. The parties shall take the first step to initiate any dispositive motion practice by October 24, 2025. Status reports due on August 25, 2025 and December 2, 2025. Please see the attached for additional deadlines. Signed by Judge Vernon D. Oliver on 8/4/2024.(Lapsia, T)
|
| Filing 22 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Stone, Amanda) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth E. Taylor on behalf of David Blackman (Taylor, Kenneth) |
| Filing 20 Amended NOTICE by Frank Nelson, Wayne W. Sell Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, (Stone, Amanda) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Vernon D. Oliver on 7/10/2024. (Lapsia, T)
|
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Frank Nelson, Wayne W. Sell Corporation.(Stone, Amanda) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time until 07/10/2024NUNC PRO TUNC Answer to Complaint #1 Notice of Removal, by Frank Nelson, Wayne W. Sell Corporation. (Stone, Amanda) |
| Answer deadline updated for Frank Nelson to 7/10/2024; Wayne W. Sell Corporation to 7/10/2024. (Samson, J) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81(c)(2)(C), Defendants' response to the Complaint was due, at the latest, seven days after the notice of removal was filed, or June 28, 2024. To date, Defendants have not filed a response to the Complaint. Defendants shall file a response to the Complaint on or before July 10, 2024, along with a motion to continue the deadline to file the response nunc pro tunc that explains the reasons for the belated filing.It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Vernon D. Oliver on 7/8/2024.(Lapsia, T)
|
| Set Deadlines: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/4/2024 (Samson, J) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #14 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #12 Electronic Filing Order, 10 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #13 Standing Protective Order, #11 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Wayne W. Sell Corporation, Frank Nelson Signed by Clerk on 6/25/2024. (Attachments: #1 Standing order on removed cases)(Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Gaskins, A) |
|
Filing 13
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Vernon D. Oliver on 6/21/2025.(Gaskins, A)
|
|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Vernon D. Oliver on 6/21/2024.(Gaskins, A)
|
|
Filing 11
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/20/2024 Discovery due by 12/21/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 1/25/2025 Signed by Clerk on 6/21/2024.(Gaskins, A)
|
| Filing 10 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 6/21/2024.(Maturo, F.) |
| Judge Vernon D. Oliver and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher M. Vossler on behalf of Frank Nelson, Wayne W. Sell Corporation (Vossler, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda Stone on behalf of Frank Nelson, Wayne W. Sell Corporation (Stone, Amanda) |
| Filing 7 Disclosure Statement Corporate Disclosure Statement by Frank Nelson, Wayne W. Sell Corporation. (Vossler, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Frank Nelson, Wayne W. Sell Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, Notice to Counsel re Local Rule (Vossler, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Frank Nelson, Wayne W. Sell Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, Compliance with Standing Order (Vossler, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Frank Nelson, Wayne W. Sell Corporation. (Vossler, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Frank Nelson, Wayne W. Sell Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, Notice of Pending Motions (Vossler, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Frank Nelson, Wayne W. Sell Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, Cert of Filing & Svc of Ntc of Removal (Attachments: #1 Superior Court Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal)(Vossler, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wayne W. Sell Corporation, Frank Nelson from Litchfield at Torrington, case number LLI-CV24-6036745. Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACTDC-7810734, filed by Wayne W. Sell Corporation, Frank Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons, #2 Exhibit Complaint)(Vossler, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
