Rodriguez v. OrthoConnecticut PLLC
| Eberto Rodriguez |
| OrthoConnecticut PLLC |
| 3:2024cv01322 |
| August 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Lewis, D) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case by Eberto Rodriguez (Lietz, David) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Erica Oates Nolan on behalf of Eberto Rodriguez (Nolan, Erica) |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until October 9, 2024 answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint #1 Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/6/2024. (Lewis, D)
|
| Answer deadline updated for OrthoConnecticut PLLC to 10/9/2024. (Lewis, D) |
| Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until October 9, 2024 answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint #1 Complaint by OrthoConnecticut PLLC. (Zakrzewski, Steven) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven J Zakrzewski on behalf of OrthoConnecticut PLLC (Zakrzewski, Steven) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eberto Rodriguez. OrthoConnecticut PLLC served on 8/19/2024, answer due 9/9/2024. (Lietz, David) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney David K. Lietz. Signed by Clerk on 8/19/2024. (Chartier, A.)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Attorney(s) David K. Lietz to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7872380) by Eberto Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit, #2 Exhibit B - Cert of Good Standing)(Slossberg, David) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *OrthoConnecticut PLLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *David A. Slossberg* *Hurwitz Sagarin Slossberg & Knuff, LLC* *135 Broad Street* *Milford, CT 06460*. (Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Eberto Rodriguez, #5 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 8/16/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Chartier, A.) |
|
Filing 5
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/15/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/15/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/15/2024 Discovery due by 2/14/2025 Dispositive Motions due by 3/21/2025 Signed by Clerk on 8/15/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 8/15/24.(Hushin, Z.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OrthoConnecticut PLLC ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7870934.), filed by Eberto Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Slossberg, David) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to OrthoConnecticut PLLC. (Slossberg, David) |
| Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. OrthoConnecticut PLLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eberto Rodriguez | |
| Represented By: | David A. Slossberg |
| Represented By: | Erica Oates Nolan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: OrthoConnecticut PLLC | |
| Represented By: | Steven J Zakrzewski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
