Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
John Doe |
3:2024cv01522 |
September 23, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Robert A Richardson |
Michael P Shea |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re #12 Order on Motion for Leave to File Third Party Early Discovery Proof of service to ISP (James, Jacqueline) |
![]() |
Filing 11 Memorandum in Support re #10 MOTION for Leave to File Third Party Early Discovery filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Paige, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Arco, #3 Affidavit Declaration of Stalzer)(James, Jacqueline) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File Third Party Early Discovery by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(James, Jacqueline) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Disclosure Statement filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #3 Report on Copyright Form, #7 Standing Protective Order, 4 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #1 Complaint filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, #6 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 9/24/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Peterson, M) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 9/23/24.(Hushin, Z.) |
Filing 3 AO 121 Report on the Case of an Action re: Copyright Form Completed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(James, Jacqueline) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (James, Jacqueline) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7912138.), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(James, Jacqueline) |
Judge Michael P Shea and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: John Doe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC | |
Represented By: | Jacqueline M. James |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.