Gilberti v. Harvard University et al
| Joseph D. Gilberti |
| Rick Scott, Hunter Carroll, James Dominguez, U.S. Senate, George W. Bush, Thomas Krug, Sarasota County Board of County Commissioners, Kimberly Carlton Bonner, Central Intelligence Agency, Vern Buchanan, Lori Martin, Maria Ruhl, Harvard University, Dick Cheney, Mark Wolfe, National Sheriff's Association, Lee Pallardy, Stephen Walker, 12th Judicial Circuit of Florida, James Conrad, United Nations, Tampa Central Command MacDill Air Force Base, Donna Marie Padar, U.S. Congress, Charles Williams, Thomas Barber, Sheri Polster Chappell, Manatee County Board of County Commissioners, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental of Protection, Carmine Marceno, City Council of Hartford, Greenberg Traurig Law, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Elon Musk, Mark Cuban, Yale University, Norte Dame University, Ron DeSantis, Archdiocese of Hartford, Thomas Widen, Donald Trump, Barrack Obama, Michelle Obama, Kamala Harris, Christopher Shaw, Ashley Moody, Sheila Sanghvi, New York Times, Eric Adams and Pentagon |
| 3:2024cv01714 |
| October 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Omar A Williams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER dismissing case. Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), courts are required to dismiss any action that is frivolous or that fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. After careful review of the complaint, the court cannot find a clear federal claim amongst the conclusory allegations therein. The facts asserted are difficult to follow, but Plaintiff appears to allege that there is some government conspiracy to withhold water from the public, and that this alleged conspiracy is being advanced by many current and former high-ranking government officials, including several presidents (whom he also accuses of kidnapping him and building a secret compound over the water sources in question). There is no detail included to support any of his accusations. He purports to bring suit under the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States, but it is unclear how any of the alleged facts implicate any provision therein. Further, it is not clear what role any of the Connecticut defendants played in the alleged conspiracy. Accordingly, the court can discern no cognizable claim in this case, and it must be dismissed. The Clerk of Court is asked, respectfully, to please close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 10/30/24. (Wagner, R)
|
|
Filing 8
Standing Order re: Letters. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 10/24/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
| Filing 7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Imbriani, S) |
|
Filing 6
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 10/24/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 10/24/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/23/2024; Discovery due by 4/25/2025; Dispositive Motions due by 5/30/2025. Signed by Clerk on 10/24/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 10/24/2024.(Gaskins, A) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: We received your Complaint which has been assigned case number 24cv1714. In order to proceed, the filing fee or a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis must be submitted to the Court by 11/23/2024 or the case will be subject to dismissal. Fee information and the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form may be found on the Court's website at ctd.uscourts.gov. Dismissal due by 11/23/2024. Signed by Clerk on 10/24/2024.(Gaskins, A)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 12th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Eric Adams, Archdiocese of Hartford, Thomas Barber, Kimberly Carlton Bonner, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Vern Buchanan, George W. Bush, Hunter Carroll, Central Intelligence Agency, Sheri Polster Chappell, Dick Cheney, City Council of Hartford, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental of Protection , James Conrad, Mark Cuban, Ron DeSantis, James Dominguez, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Greenberg Traurig Law, Kamala Harris, Harvard University, Thomas Krug, Manatee County Board of County Commissioners, Carmine Marceno, Lori Martin, Ashley Moody, Elon Musk, National Sheriff's Association, Norte Dame University, Barrack Obama, Michelle Obama, Donna Marie Padar, Lee Pallardy, Maria Ruhl, Sheila Sanghvi, Sarasota County Board of County Commissioners, Rick Scott, Christopher Shaw, Tampa Central Command MacDill Air Force Base, New York Times, Pentagon, Donald Trump, U.S. Congress, U.S. Senate, United Nations, Stephen Walker, Thomas Widen, Charles Williams, Mark Wolfe, Yale University, filed by Joseph D Gilberti. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Gaskins, A) Modified on 10/30/2024 to correct parties (Hushin, Z.). |
| Judge Omar A. Williams and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Sichanh, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
