Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Krajewski et al
| Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company |
| Brian Hartwell, Michael Krajewski doing business as Mike's Masonry & Chimney Sweep and Frances Hartwell |
| 3:2024cv01963 |
| December 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement by Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company. (Rudzik, Keith) |
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 12/11/2024.(Perez, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brian Hartwell, Frances Hartwell, Michael Krajewski ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7997556.), filed by Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Underlying Complaint))(Rudzik, Keith) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Rudzik, Keith) |
| Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
