Melnik v. King
Ronald Melnik |
Michelle F. King |
Social Security Administration |
3:2025cv00149 |
January 29, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Maria E Garcia |
Michael P Shea |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut.(Nuzzi, T) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel: Due to privacy restrictions on social security cases, absent both a consent to electronic notice and an approved motion for efiling privileges, counsel must mail paper copies to self-represented litigants. Signed by Clerk on 1/29/2025.(Nuzzi, T) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ivan Michael Katz on behalf of Ronald Melnik. (Nuzzi, T) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michelle F. King, filed by Ronald Melnik. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Nuzzi, T) |
Filing fee received from Ronald Melnik: $ 405, receipt number 290747(Nuzzi, T) |
Judge Michael P Shea and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B) |
Answer deadline updated for Michelle F. King to 3/31/2025. (Nuzzi, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.