Cristina v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Plaintiff: Anthony Cristina
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Case Number: 3:2025cv00368
Filed: March 14, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarala V Nagala
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2025 Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *National Railroad Passenger Corp.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Marc T. Wietzke* *Flynn & Wietzke, P.C* *1205 Franklin Avenue Suite 370* *Garden City, NY 11530*. (Gaskins, A)
March 14, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #1 Complaint filed by Anthony Cristina, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #5 Standing Protective Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 3/14/2025.(Gaskins, A)
March 14, 2025 Filing 6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Gaskins, A)
March 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 3/14/2025.(Gaskins, A)
March 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 3/14/2025.(Gaskins, A)
March 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/13/2025 Discovery due by 9/15/2025 Dispositive Motions due by 10/20/2025 Signed by Clerk on 3/14/2025.(Gaskins, A)
March 14, 2025 Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 3/14/25.(Hushin, Z.)
March 14, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Railroad Passenger Corp. ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-8097506.), filed by Anthony Cristina.(Wietzke, Marc)
March 14, 2025 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to National Railroad Passenger Corp.. (Wietzke, Marc)
March 14, 2025 CASE ASSIGNMENT: District Judge Sarala V. Nagala assigned to the case. If the District Judge issues an Order of Referral to a Magistrate Judge for any matter other than settlement, the matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish. (Oliver, T.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cristina v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Cristina
Represented By: Marc T. Wietzke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?