Kulmann v. Sullivan
Linda Kulmann and Linda Ceniccola-Kulmann |
Timothy Sullivan |
3:2025cv00596 |
April 11, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Omar A Williams |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Kelsey, N) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(b), a disclosure statement required under Rule 7.1(a) must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 4/11/2025. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Linda Kulmann. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Linda Kulmann from Judicial District of Waterbury, case number UWY-CV-24-5035111-S., filed by Linda Kulmann. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2) (Peterson, M) |
CASE ASSIGNMENT: District Judge Omar A. Williams assigned to the case. If the District Judge issues an Order of Referral to a Magistrate Judge for any matter other than settlement, the matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish. (Sichanh, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.