Telcordia Tech Inc. v. CISCO Systems Inc.
| Telcordia Technologies Inc. |
| CISCO Systems Inc. |
| CISCO Systems Inc. |
| Telcordia Technologies Inc. |
| 1:2004cv00876 |
| July 16, 2004 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Gregory M. Sleet |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
439
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re damages and royalty rates post-verdict. Signed by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 4/14/2014. (asw)
|
|
Filing
420
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING 366 MOTION for Permanent Injunction or, in the Alternative, for an Order Requiring Cisco to Pay a Market-Rate Royalty filed by Telcordia Technologies Inc., DENYING 375 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law, GR ANTING 362 MOTION for (1) an Award of Prejudgment Interest and (2) an Accounting of Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Infringing Sales Since January 31, 2007 filed by Telcordia Technologies Inc., DENYING 371 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Exp enses Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 285 and/or the Court's Inherent Equitable Authority filed by Telcordia Technologies Inc., DENYING 373 MOTION for New Trial on Willful Infringement Pursuant to Rule 59(a) filed by CISCO Systems Inc., DENYING 369 MOTION to Enhance Damages Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 284 filed by Telcordia Technologies Inc. Signed by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 1/6/2009. (asw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
