Redbox Automated Retail LLC v. Warner Home Video
Redbox Automated Retail LLC |
Warner Home Video |
1:2009cv00613 |
August 18, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Unassigned Judge |
Plaintiff |
15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE CLOSED per DI# 29. (rwc) |
SO ORDERED, re 20 Stipulation to File Amended Complaint by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 2/5/10. (rwc) |
Filing 29 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Redbox Automated Retail LLC as to THE ABOVE CAPTIONED ACTION AND EVERY CLAIM ASSERTED THEREIN, WITH PREJUDICE (Green, James) |
Filing 28 REPLY BRIEF re 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (DEFENDANT WARNER HOME VIDEO'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6)) MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (DEFENDANT WARNER HOME VIDEO'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6)) filed by Warner Home Video. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
Filing 27 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (DEFENDANT WARNER HOME VIDEO'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6)) MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (DEFENDANT WARNER HOME VIDEO'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6)) filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/8/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-E)(Green, James) |
Filing 26 ORDER - granting re 18 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Colleen P. Sorensen filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. Signed by Judge Joel Schneider on 1/21/10. (rwc) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider. Motions referred to Joel Schneider.(rwc) |
SO ORDERED, re 25 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Pei Y. Chung filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 1/4/10. (rwc) |
Filing 25 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Pei Y. Chung - filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certification)(Green, James) |
Filing 24 DECLARATION re 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (DEFENDANT WARNER HOME VIDEO'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6)) MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (DEFENDANT WARNER HOME VIDEO'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6)) (DECLARATION OF KATHERINE B. FORREST) by Warner Home Video. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - G)(Ferguson, Stephen) |
Filing 23 OPENING BRIEF in Support re 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (DEFENDANT WARNER HOME VIDEO'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6)) MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (DEFENDANT WARNER HOME VIDEO'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6)) filed by Warner Home Video.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 1/7/2010. (Ferguson, Stephen) |
Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (DEFENDANT WARNER HOME VIDEO'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6)) - filed by Warner Home Video. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ferguson, Stephen) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Joel Schneider - Status Teleconference held on 12/7/2009. (rwc) |
Filing 21 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Warner Home Video- filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Green, James) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION to File Amended Complaint by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. (Green, James) |
Filing 19 ORDER - Setting Deadlines/Hearings ( Status Teleconference set for 12/7/2009 10:00 AM before Judge Joel Schneider.). Signed by Judge Joel Schneider on 11/9/09. (rwc) |
Filing 18 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Colleen P. Sorensen - filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. (Green, James) |
Filing 17 Stipulation for Extension of Time to file Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. (Green, James) Modified on 10/15/2009 (rwc). |
Filing 16 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1 filed by Warner Home Video identifying Corporate Parent Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. for Warner Home Video.. (Gaza, Anne) |
Filing 15 DECLARATION re 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Defendant Warner Home Video's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)) MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Defendant Warner Home Video's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)) (Declaration of Katherine B. Forrest) by Warner Home Video. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - D)(Gaza, Anne) |
Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF in Support re 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Defendant Warner Home Video's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)) MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Defendant Warner Home Video's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)) filed by Warner Home Video.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 10/19/2009. (Gaza, Anne) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Defendant Warner Home Video's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)) - filed by Warner Home Video. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Gaza, Anne) |
Filing 12 ORDER - granting re 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Katherine B. Forrest filed by Warner Home Video. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 9/17/09. (rwc) |
Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER granting admission pro hac vice of Katherine B. Forrest re 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Katherine B. Forrest by Warner Home Video. (Gaza, Anne) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Katherine B. Forrest - filed by Warner Home Video. (Gaza, Anne) |
SO ORDERED, re 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint to October 1, 2009 - Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Warner Home Video answer due 10/1/2009. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 9/8/09. (rwc) |
SO ORDERED, re 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney George R. Dougherty filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC, 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Charles S. Bergen filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC, 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael S. Gulland filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 9/8/09. (rwc) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney George R. Dougherty - filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. (Green, James) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael S. Gulland - filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. (Green, James) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Charles S. Bergen - filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. (Green, James) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint to October 1, 2009 - filed by Warner Home Video. (Gaza, Anne) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. Warner Home Video served on 8/25/2009, answer due 9/14/2009. (Green, James) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert B. Kugler of the District of New Jersey (in lieu of Vacant Judgeship). Please include the initials of the Judge (RBK) after the case number on all documents filed. (Courtesy copies of filings should be sent to the chambers of the assigned Judge). (rjb) |
Summons Reissued (Alias Summons) as to Warner Home Video. (fms) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. Warner Home Video served on 8/19/2009, answer due 9/8/2009. (Green, James) |
Summons Issued as to Warner Home Video on 8/19/2009. (rwc) |
Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1 filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC identifying Other Affiliate Coinstar Inc. for Redbox Automated Retail LLC. (ksr) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction (ksr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Warner Home Video - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 255.) - filed by Redbox Automated Retail LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Acknowledgement of Consent Form, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet)(ksr) |
No Summons Issued (ksr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Redbox Automated Retail LLC v. Warner Home Video | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Redbox Automated Retail LLC | |
Represented By: | James S. Green |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Warner Home Video | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.