Malandrino v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Ashley R. Malandrino
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2010cv00670
Filed: August 10, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: Sussex
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM ORDER - denying 25 MOTION to Alter Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Michael J. Astrue. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 12/27/13. (mdb)
September 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION re cross-motions for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/18/12. (ntl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Malandrino v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley R. Malandrino
Represented By: Stephen A. Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?