Jester v. Phelps et al
| John L. Jester |
| Perry Phelps, Carl Danberg and Doe |
| 1:2011cv00187 |
| March 4, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Sue L. Robinson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM ORDER- The claims against Perry Phelps and Carl Danberg are dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and § 1915A, and plaintiff may proceed against the remaining defendants. Plaintiff shall return to Clerk original USM 285 form(s) for Correctional Medical Services. Upon receipt, the U.S. Marshal shall serve process as directed by plaintiff. (Copy to pltf.) Carl Danberg and Perry Phelps terminated. (PLEASE REFER TO ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 10/17/2011. (lid)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM ORDER- DISMISSING the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(8)(ii) and § 1915A(b)(1). Plaintiff is given leave to amend the complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Failure to file the amended complaint shall result in dismissal of action. Set Deadlines ( Amended Pleadings due by 9/6/2011.) Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 7/29/2011. (lid)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
