Comcast IP Holdings I LLC v. Sprint Communications Company LP et al
Comcast IP Holdings I LLC |
Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Spectrum LP and Nextel Operations Inc. |
1:2012cv00205 |
February 21, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
New Castle |
Richard G. Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1 filed by Comcast IP Holdings I LLC. (dmp, ) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 7,012,916; US 7,206,304; US 7,903,641; US 6,873,694;. (dmp, ) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction (dmp, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed with Jury Demand against Nextel Operations Inc., Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Spectrum LP - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 311-1026299.) - filed by Comcast IP Holdings I LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet)(dmp, ) |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Nextel Operations Inc. on 2/21/2012; Sprint Communications Company LP on 2/21/2012; Sprint Spectrum LP on 2/21/2012. (dmp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.