GN Netcom Inc. v. Plantronics Inc.

Plaintiff: GN Netcom Inc.
Defendant: Plantronics Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv01318
Filed: October 12, 2012
Court: Delaware District Court
Office: Wilmington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Leonard P. Stark
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 23, 2013 20 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION re 8 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/23/13. (ntl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GN Netcom Inc. v. Plantronics Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GN Netcom Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. Farnan
Represented By: Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
Represented By: Brian E. Farnan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Plantronics Inc.
Represented By: Chul Pak
Represented By: David H. Reichenberg
Represented By: Jonathan M. Jacobson
Represented By: Richard L. Horwitz
Represented By: Robert Corp
Represented By: John Anderson Sensing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.