Enzo Life Sciences Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories et al
Enzo Life Sciences Inc. |
Abbott Molecular Inc. and Abbott Laboratories |
1:2013cv00225 |
February 11, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Leonard P Stark |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 OPINION of USCA as to #15 Notice of Appeal (Federal Circuit) filed by Enzo Life Sciences Inc. (ntl) |
Filing 20 ORDER of USCA as to #15 Notice of Appeal (Federal Circuit) filed by Enzo Life Sciences Inc. Decision of USCA: Opinion issued under seal on 6/20/19 is unsealed. (ntl) |
Filing 19 JUDGMENT of USCA as to #15 Notice of Appeal (Federal Circuit) filed by Enzo Life Sciences Inc. Decision of USCA: AFFIRMED. (ntl) |
Filing 18 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,097,405 B1. (etg) |
Filing 17 TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by Enzo Life Sciences Inc. TRANSCRIPT NOT NEEDED (Farnan, Brian) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA for the Federal Circuit re #15 Notice of Appeal (Federal Circuit) filed by Enzo Life Sciences Inc. USCA Case Number 17-2546. (ntl) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Federal Circuit of #14 Judgment . Appeal filed by Enzo Life Sciences Inc.. (Farnan, Michael) |
USCA Appeal Fees received: $505, receipt number 0311-2223984 re #15 Notice of Appeal (Federal Circuit) filed by Enzo Life Sciences Inc. (Farnan, Michael). (dmp, ) |
Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit re #15 Notice of Appeal (Federal Circuit). (ceg) |
Filing 14 FINAL JUDGMENT (See Judgment for further details) (CASE CLOSED). Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/1/17. Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00274-LPS, 1:13-cv-00225-LPS (ntl) |
SO ORDERED, re #11 Stipulation and Order to permit filing of plaintiff's first amended complaint and answer thereto filed by Enzo Life Sciences Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 4/22/13. (ntl) |
Remark: This case has been consolidated with Civil Action No. 12-274-LPS pursuant to the Stipulation and Order (See D.I. 67). (ntl) |
Case associated with lead case: Create association to 1:12-cv-00274-LPS. (ntl) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard L. Horwitz on behalf of Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Molecular Inc. (Horwitz, Richard) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Bindu Ann George Palapura on behalf of Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Molecular Inc. (Palapura, Bindu) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION Regarding Filing of First Amended Complaint and Defendants' Answer and Counterclaims Thereto by Enzo Life Sciences Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Brian) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Elizabeth J. Thompson,Melinda K. Lackey for Abbott Laboratories added for electronic noticing. (dmp, ) |
SO ORDERED, re #10 Stipulation Extending Response Deadline filed by Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Molecular Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 4/12/13. (ntl) |
Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Deadline to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Molecular Inc.. (Moore, David) |
SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James F. Hurst, Maureen L. Rurka, Elizabeth J. Thompson, and Melinda K. Lackey of Winston & Strawn LLP filed by Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Molecular Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 4/2/13. (ntl) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James F. Hurst, Maureen L. Rurka, Elizabeth J. Thompson, and Melinda K. Lackey of Winston & Strawn LLP - filed by Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Molecular Inc.. (Moore, David) |
Filing 8 Letter to The Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Brian E. Farnan regarding Proposed Protective Order Dispute. (Farnan, Brian) |
Filing 7 Letter to The Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding protective order dispute. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Blumenfeld, Jack) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER OF RELATED CASE by Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Molecular Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Horwitz, Richard) |
SO ORDERED, re #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John M. Desmarais, Michael P. Stadnick, Xiao Li, Joseph C. Akalski, and Lauren M. Nowierski filed by Enzo Life Sciences Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/28/13. (ntl) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John M. Desmarais, Michael P. Stadnick, Xiao Li, Joseph C. Akalski, and Lauren M. Nowierski - filed by Enzo Life Sciences Inc.. (Farnan, Brian) |
SO ORDERED, re #4 Stipulation Accepting Service of Complaint and Extending Response Deadline filed by Enzo Life Sciences Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/22/13. (ntl) |
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (bkb) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION accepting Service of Complaint and Extending Response Deadline to 4/12/2013 by Enzo Life Sciences Inc.. (Farnan, Brian) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,097,405 B1;. (els) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction (els) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Molecular Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0311-1226436.) - filed by Enzo Life Sciences Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(els) |
No Summons Issued (els) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.