Semcon Tech LLC v. ProMOS Technologies Inc.
Plaintiff:
Semcon Tech LLC
Defendant:
ProMOS Technologies Inc.
Case Number:
1:2013cv00702
Filed:
April 18, 2013
Court:
Delaware District Court
Office:
Wilmington Office
County:
New Castle
Presiding Judge:
Richard G. Andrews
Nature of Suit:
Patent
Cause of Action:
35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Semcon Tech LLC v. ProMOS Technologies Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Semcon Tech LLC | |
| Represented By: | Alexander C. D. Giza |
| Represented By: | Marc A. Fenster |
| Represented By: | Stephen B. Brauerman |
| Represented By: | Richard D. Kirk |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Liao |
| Represented By: | Vanessa Ribeiro Tiradentes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ProMOS Technologies Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.