Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc.
| Acceleration Bay LLC |
| Electronic Arts Inc. |
| Sony Interactive Entertainment America, LLC |
| Allen M. -SM- Terrell, Jr. |
| 1:2016cv00454 |
| June 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Acceleration Bay LLC. Electronic Arts Inc. served on 6/17/2016, answer due 7/8/2016. (Rovner, Philip)
|
|
Filing 4
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Acceleration Bay LLC.(aah)
|
|
Filing 3
Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,701,344 B1; US 6,714,966 B1; US 6,732,147 B1; US 6,829,634 B1; US 6,910,069 B1; US 6,920,497 B1;(aah)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction.(aah)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Electronic Arts Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-1949004.)- filed by Acceleration Bay LLC.(Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-3, #2 Exhibit 4-6, #3 Exhibit 7-11, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(aah)
|
|
No Summons Issued. (aah)
|
|
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Electronic Arts Inc. on 6/17/2016. (klc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
