Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
| Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH and Sanofi Winthrop Industrie |
| Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. |
| Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. |
| Sanofi Winthrop Industrie, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC |
| 1:2016cv00812 |
| September 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Richard G. Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
287
MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. John McLean (D.I. 253 ) is DENIED without prejudice, and the Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Rodolfo Pinal (D.I. 253 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/29/2018. (nms)
|
|
Filing
264
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Defendant's motion for summary judgment (D.I. 180 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion to strike (D.I. 219 ) is DISMISSED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/16/2018. (nms)
|
|
Filing
192
MEMORANDUM OPINION providing claim construction for multiple terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,603,044, 8,679,069, 8,992,486, 9,526,844, 9,533,105, 9,457,152, 9,592,348, 7,476,652, 7,713,930, and 9,604,008. Within five days the parties shall submit a proposed order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/12/2018. (nms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
