Donato v. Berryhill

Donato v. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Margarita O. Donato
Defendant:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	1:2018cv00476
Filed:	March 28, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office:	Wilmington Office
County:	New Castle
Presiding Judge:	Leonard P. Stark
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1383
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 9, 2019	Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. The case is remanded with instructions to: 1) Address t he excluded limitations in the hypothetical question posed to the VE as discussed in this Recommendation; and 2) Re-assess Plaintiff's residual functional capacity and her ability to return to past relevant work. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/9/2019. (nmf)
July 22, 2019	Filing 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Margarita O. Donato, GRANTED In Part and DENIED In Part. 18 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Nancy A. Berryhill DENIED In Part and GRANTED In Part. Please not e that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 8/5/2019. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 7/22/19. (kjk)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 9, 2019

Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. The case is remanded with instructions to: 1) Address t he excluded limitations in the hypothetical question posed to the VE as discussed in this Recommendation; and 2) Re-assess Plaintiff's residual functional capacity and her ability to return to past relevant work. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/9/2019. (nmf)

July 22, 2019

Filing 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Margarita O. Donato, GRANTED In Part and DENIED In Part. 18 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Nancy A. Berryhill DENIED In Part and GRANTED In Part. Please not e that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 8/5/2019. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 7/22/19. (kjk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Donato v. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Margarita O. Donato
Represented By:	Angela Pinto Ross
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?