Tolliver v. Highmark BCBSD, Inc.
Plaintiff: Denise M. Tolliver
Defendant: Highmark BCBSD, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv00797
Filed: May 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: Kent
Presiding Judge: Gregory M. Sleet
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM ORDER: The request to reconsider (D.I. 19 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/13/2019. (nms)
January 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION - Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/9/19. (rwc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tolliver v. Highmark BCBSD, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Highmark BCBSD, Inc.
Represented By: Geoffrey Graham Grivner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise M. Tolliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?