Bishop v. Red Hat, Inc. et al
| Christopher Nunn Bishop |
| W. Steve Albrecht, Alfred W. Zollar, Narendra K. Gupta, Red Hat, Inc., Kevin M. Murai, William S. Kaiser, James M. Whitehurst, Sohaib Abbasi, Kimberly L. Hammonds and Charlene T. Begley |
| 1:2018cv02045 |
| December 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Christopher Nunn Bishop (Long, Brian) |
| CASE CLOSED per. D.I. #3 . (nms) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-02022-RGA, 1:18-cv-02045-RGA (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ceg) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Sohaib Abbasi, W. Steve Albrecht, Charlene T. Begley, Narendra K. Gupta, Kimberly L. Hammonds, William S. Kaiser, Kevin M. Murai, Red Hat, Inc., James M. Whitehurst, Alfred W. Zollar - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2531081.) - filed by Christopher Nunn Bishop. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ceg) |
| No Summons Issued. (ceg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
