Witmer v. Immune Design Corp. et al
| Colleen Witmer |
| David Baltimore, Susan L. Kelley, Lewis Coleman, Immune Design Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Ed Penhoet, William R. Ringo, Cascade Merger Sub Inc., Franklin M. Berger and Carlos Paya |
| 1:2019cv00532 |
| March 19, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Colleen Witmer (Long, Brian) |
| CASE CLOSED per D.I. #3 . (dlw) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| No Summons Issued. (nmg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed with Jury Demand against David Baltimore, Franklin M. Berger, Cascade Merger Sub Inc., Lewis Coleman, Immune Design Corp., Susan L. Kelley, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Carlos Paya, Ed Penhoet, William R. Ringo - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2597693.) - filed by Colleen Witmer. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
