Blackbird Tech LLC v. Wells Fargo & Company
| Blackbird Tech LLC |
| Wells Fargo & Company |
| 1:2019cv01129 |
| June 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jeffrey D. Ahdoot, and Wendy H. Verlander for Blackbird Tech LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d), Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (sam) |
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Wendy Verlander and Jeffrey Ahdoot filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 7/30/19. (ntl)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Wendy Verlander and Jeffrey Ahdoot - filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Blackbird Tech LLC: For Wells Fargo & Company waiver sent on 7/9/2019, answer due 9/9/2019. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (nmg) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Blackbird Tech LLC. Wells Fargo & Company served on 6/20/2019, answer due 7/11/2019. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Wells Fargo & Company on 6/19/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (ceg) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. (ceg) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 7,958,214 B1; US 8,285,832 B2; US 9,424,848 B2. (ceg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ceg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Wells Fargo & Company - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2667669.) - filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(ceg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blackbird Tech LLC v. Wells Fargo & Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Blackbird Tech LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
| Represented By: | Richard Charles Weinblatt |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey D. Ahdoot |
| Represented By: | Wendy H. Verlander |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wells Fargo & Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
