Kennedy v. Stark et al
| Edward Thomas Kennedy |
| Leonard P. Stark, Colm F. Connolly and Richard G. Andrews |
| 1:2019cv01641 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 OBJECTIONS by Edward Thomas Kennedy to D.I. #5 Order Dismissing Case. (myr) |
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE (copy to pltf.) (CASE CLOSED). Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/18/2019. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER - D.I. #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff shall pay the $400.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order or the case will be dismissed. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/12/2019. (amf)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lak) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT - filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against Richard G. Andrews, Colm F. Connolly, Leonard P. Stark - filed by Edward Thomas Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (lak) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Edward Thomas Kennedy. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
