Shipman v. State Of Delaware et al
| D'Rayfield Kary Khame Shipman |
| State Of Delaware and City of Wilmington Delaware |
| 1:2019cv01713 |
| September 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Reconsideration re D.I. #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, - filed by D'Rayfield Kary Khame Shipman. (myr) |
Filing 4
ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff shall pay the $400.00 filing fee within thirty days from the date of this Order, or the case shall be dismissed. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/18/2019. (kmd)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lak) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against City of Wilmington Delaware, State Of Delaware - filed by D'Rayfield Kary Khame Shipman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (lak) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by D'Rayfield Kary Khame Shipman. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
