Stein v. AK Steel Holding Corporation et al
Shiva Stein |
Sheri H. Edison, Arlene M. Yocum, Vincente Wright, Ralph S. Michael, III, Dennis C. Cuneo, Dwayne A. Wilson, Roger K. Newport, AK Steel Holding Corporation, Gregory B. Kenny, Mark G. Essig and William K. Gerber |
1:2020cv00054 |
January 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Leonard P Stark |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE CLOSED (ntl) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Shiva Stein (Long, Brian) |
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00054-LPS, 1:20-cv-00078-LPS (rjb) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (kmd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed with Jury Demand against AK Steel Holding Corporation, Dennis C. Cuneo, Sheri H. Edison, Mark G. Essig, William K. Gerber, Gregory B. Kenny, Ralph S. Michael, III, Roger K. Newport, Dwayne A. Wilson, Vincente Wright, Arlene M. Yocum - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2825275.) - filed by Shiva Stein. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmd) |
No Summons Issued. (kmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.