Route Guidance Systems LLC v. INRIX, Inc.
Plaintiff: Route Guidance Systems LLC
Defendant: INRIX, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv00221
Filed: February 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Maryellen Noreika
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2020 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Neil J. McNabnay,Ricardo J. Bonilla,Aaron P. Pirouznia for INRIX, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal)
March 16, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil J. McNabnay, Ricardo J. Bonilla and Aaron P. Pirouznia - filed by INRIX, Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy)
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil J. McNabnay, Ricardo J. Bonilla and Aaron P. Pirouznia filed by INRIX, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 3/16/2020. (dlw)
March 11, 2020 Filing 5 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to ANSWER Complaint to April 13, 2020 - filed by INRIX, Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy)
March 11, 2020 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #5 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to April 13, 2020 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: INRIX, Inc. answer due 4/13/2020). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 3/11/2020. (dlw)
February 20, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Route Guidance Systems LLC. INRIX, Inc. served on 2/20/2020, answer due 3/12/2020. (Devlin, Timothy)
February 19, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00221-MN, 1:20-cv-00222-MN (rjb)
February 13, 2020 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,917,876 B2. (mal)
February 13, 2020 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal)
February 13, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against INRIX, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2852773.) - filed by Route Guidance Systems LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal)
February 13, 2020 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to INRIX, Inc. on 2/13/2020. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (mal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Route Guidance Systems LLC v. INRIX, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INRIX, Inc.
Represented By: Jeremy Douglas Anderson
Represented By: Aaron P. Pirouznia
Represented By: Neil J. McNabnay
Represented By: Ricardo J. Bonilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Route Guidance Systems LLC
Represented By: Timothy Devlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?