Actifio, Inc. v. Rubrik, Inc.
| Actifio, Inc. |
| Rubrik, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00886 |
| June 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Actifio, Inc.. Rubrik, Inc. served on 6/30/2020, answer due 7/21/2020. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Filing 6 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (myr) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Maximilian A. Grant, Giri Pathmanaban, and Marc N. Zubick - filed by Actifio, Inc. (myr) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Actifio, Inc.. (myr) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,732,244 ;6,959,369 ;9,495,435 ;10,013,313. (myr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Rubrik, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-3026299.) - filed by Actifio, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
