ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Limited et al
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. |
MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and MSN Laboratories Private Limited |
1:2020cv01029 |
July 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Richard G Andrews |
Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STIPULATION and Order to Extend Time - filed by MSN Laboratories Private Limited, MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Green, James) Modified on 8/19/2020 (nms). |
SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION and Order to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: MSN Laboratories Private Limited answer due 9/30/2020; MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. answer due 9/30/2020). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/19/2020. (nms) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Chad J. Peterman, Bruce M. Wexler, Scott F. Peachman for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-01021-RGA, 1:20-cv-01022-RGA, 1:20-cv-01029-RGA(kmd) |
Filing 9 Declaration of Mailing for Complaint served on D. Lizama on August 6, 2020, filed by ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-B)(Taylor, James) Modified on 8/11/2020 (nms). |
Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Chad J. Peterman, Bruce M. Wexler, and Scott F. Peachman - filed by ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attorney Certifications)(Taylor, James) |
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Chad J. Peterman, Bruce M. Wexler, and Scott F. Peachman, filed by ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/6/2020. (nms) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.. MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. served on 8/5/2020, answer due 8/26/2020. (Taylor, James) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-01021-UNA, 1:20-cv-01022-UNA, 1:20-cv-01029-UNA(nms) |
Filing 6 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (Taylor, James) |
CORRECTING ENTRY: Added Related Cases per Letter Dated 7/31/20. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00986-RGA, 1:20-cv-00985-RGA, 1:20-cv-01021-UNA, 1:20-cv-01022-UNA, 1:20-cv-01029-UNA(rwc) |
Filing 5 Letter to John A. Cerino, from James D. Taylor, Jr., regarding related cases. (Taylor, James) Modified on 8/5/2020 (nms). |
No Summons Issued. (amf) |
Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,732,615 and 10,646,480. (amf) |
Filing 3 Supplemental information for patent cases involving an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) - Date Patentee(s) Received Notice: June 18, 2020. Date of Expiration of Patent: SEE ATTACHED FORM.Thirty Month Stay Deadline: 10/29/2023. (amf) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (amf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed against MSN Laboratories Private Limited, MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-3097796) - filed by ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(amf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.