Roadarmel v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation
| Patricia Roadarmel |
| Curtiss-Wright Corporation |
| 1:2020cv01375 |
| October 9, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Sherry R Fallon |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Letter to Magistrate Judge Sherry R. Fallon from David W. deBruin regarding Response to Oral Order to Show Cause. (deBruin, David) Modified on 12/4/2020 (lih). |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Samuel D. Elswick, Esquire - filed by Patricia Roadarmel. (Attachments: #1 Certification)Motions referred to Sherry R. Fallon.(deBruin, David) |
SO ORDERED- re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Samuel D. Elswick. Signed by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 12/4/2020. (lih)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Curtiss-Wright Corporation.(Tome, Brian) Modified on 11/20/2020 (lih). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Tome on behalf of Curtiss-Wright Corporation (Tome, Brian) |
|
ORAL ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) CONFERENCE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) A scheduling teleconference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) will be held on 1/6/2021 at 4:30 p.m. (2) The parties are required to prepare for the teleconference by conferring on all matters under Rule 16 and D. Del. LR 16 and shall submit a proposed Scheduling Order to the Court no later than 12/30/2020. The Court's form asbestos scheduling order is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Fallon, Forms). If the parties have any suggestions or modifications to the standard Scheduling Order, they may be included in the proposed order for consideration by the Court. (3) If any disputed issue exists regarding the proposed Scheduling Order, it shall be noted therein, along with the parties proposed language on the issue for consideration by the Court. Ordered by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 11/20/2020. (lih)
|
|
ORAL ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Whereas, in response to the courts October 30, 2020 order (D.I. #3 ), Plaintiffs counsel filed a letter with the court on November 12, 2020, stating that Defendant Curtiss-Wright had been served with the complaint but had not answered, objected, or otherwise pleaded in this case (D.I. #4 ); Whereas, the letter further suggested that it may be prudent to delay scheduling a Rule 16 scheduling conference until Defendant Curtiss-Wright answers, objects, or otherwise defends the case (Id.); and Whereas, to date, Defendant Curtiss-Wright has not answered, objected, or otherwise pleaded in this case; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, on or before December 4, 2020, Plaintiff shall (1) confirm proper service of process of the complaint on Defendant Curtiss-Wright, (2) if service has been properly effected, notify the court whether Plaintiff intends to move for a default in appearance, and (3) provide the court with any other information as to why this case has not progressed. Ordered by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on November 20, 2020. (lih)
|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to #3 Order. (deBruin, David) Modified on 11/12/2020 (lih). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER- Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order: (1) Plaintiff(s) shall submit a statement to the Court that: (a) identifies those Defendants who have not yet been served with the Complaint; (b) identifies those Defendants who have been served with the Complaint but have not yet filed an Answer; (c) provides any reason why a Rule 16 conference should not occur within 30 days of the date of its submission; and (d) notes any other pending matters which require judicial action. Signed by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 10/30/2020. (lih)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Sherry R. Fallon. (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (amf) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL and copies of documents from Delaware Superior Court for NCC, Case Number N20C-04-241 ASB (Filing fee $400, receipt number ADEDC-3256502)- filed by Curtiss-Wright Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(amf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roadarmel v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Curtiss-Wright Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Brian Tome |
| Represented By: | Walter John O'Brien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patricia Roadarmel | |
| Represented By: | David W. deBruin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
