Joseph v. Fritzlen
John Joseph and John Joseph Bragna, Jr. |
Bill Fritzlen |
1:2021cv01240 |
August 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Remedy, Proof of Service and Civil Cover Sheet served on Bill Fritzlen on 9/15/2021, filed by John Joseph Bragna, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(twk) |
Remark: Petitioner's Name Updated Per D.I. #5 . (srs) |
Filing 5 Letter to Clerk of Court from John Joseph Bragna Jr. regarding Name Correction. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(srs) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT FOR F.R.Civ.P. 4 - Acknowledgment filed by John Joseph. (twk) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Bill Fritzlen. (apk) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk) |
Filing 1 MOTION Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Filing Fee Paid DEX036111) - filed by John Joseph. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(apk) |
Remark: Copy of Rule 4 Mailed to Petitioner. (apk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.